DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Isuzu Ascender vs 2005 Ford Thunderbird Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Isuzu Ascender

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

79.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

IsuzuMakeFord
AscenderModelThunderbird
2004Model year2005
Off-road vehicleBody typeCabriolet
7Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h6,8 s
175 km/hTop speed220 km/h
4157 ccEngine displacement3950 cc
279 HPPower283 HP
373 NmTorque388 Nm
6Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
95 ltFuel tank68 lt
15,7 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
11,8 ltExtra-urban consumption10,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
245/65 R17Tyre size235/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5273 mmLength4730 mm
1933 mmWidth1829 mm
1918 mmHeight1323 mm
2245 KgWeight1748 Kg
3277 mmWheelbase2723 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Isuzu Ascender and 2005 Ford Thunderbird approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Isuzu Ascender leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…