DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Ford Thunderbird vs 2004 Isuzu Ascender Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Isuzu Ascender

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeIsuzu
ThunderbirdModelAscender
2005Model year2004
CabrioletBody typeOff-road vehicle
2Seats7
2Doors5

Performance

6,8 s0–100 km/h—
220 km/hTop speed175 km/h
3950 ccEngine displacement4157 cc
283 HPPower279 HP
388 NmTorque373 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank95 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption15,7 lt
10,3 ltExtra-urban consumption11,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/50 R17Tyre size245/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4730 mmLength5273 mm
1829 mmWidth1933 mm
1323 mmHeight1918 mm
1748 KgWeight2245 Kg
2723 mmWheelbase3277 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Ford Thunderbird and 2004 Isuzu Ascender approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Isuzu Ascender leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…