DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Ford Thunderbird vs 2003 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
RESULT

Tie

The two cars have the same overall E-Kıyasla score.

75.75–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeRenault
ThunderbirdModelClio
2003Model year2003
CabrioletBody typeCoupe
2Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

6,8 s0–100 km/h6,0 s
220 km/hTop speed235 km/h
3950 ccEngine displacement2946 cc
283 HPPower255 HP
388 NmTorque300 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank61 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption14,9 lt
10,3 ltExtra-urban consumption8,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/50 R17Tyre size205/50 R17; 235/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4730 mmLength3800 mm
1829 mmWidth1810 mm
1323 mmHeight1360 mm
1748 KgWeight1335 Kg
2723 mmWheelbase2510 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Ford Thunderbird and 2003 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

The two cars have the same overall E-Kıyasla score. The better choice therefore depends more heavily on priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance and equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…