DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Saab 9-7X vs 2003 Ford Thunderbird Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-7X

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

76.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SaabMakeFord
9-7XModelThunderbird
2005Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

8,6 s0–100 km/h6,8 s
191 km/hTop speed220 km/h
4157 ccEngine displacement3950 cc
279 HPPower283 HP
373 NmTorque388 Nm
6Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
83 ltFuel tank68 lt
15,7 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
11,8 ltExtra-urban consumption10,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
255/55 R18Tyre size235/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4922 mmLength4730 mm
1915 mmWidth1829 mm
1791 mmHeight1323 mm
2140 KgWeight1748 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2723 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Saab 9-7X and 2003 Ford Thunderbird approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-7X leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…