DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Nissan Pathfinder vs 2003 Ford Thunderbird Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Pathfinder

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

76.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeFord
PathfinderModelThunderbird
2005Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeCabriolet
7Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

8,9 s0–100 km/h6,8 s
190 km/hTop speed220 km/h
3954 ccEngine displacement3950 cc
269 HPPower283 HP
385 NmTorque388 Nm
6Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank68 lt
18,7 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
10,5 ltExtra-urban consumption10,3 lt
13,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
255/65 R17Tyre size235/50 R17
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4877 mmLength4730 mm
1854 mmWidth1829 mm
1879 mmHeight1323 mm
2132 KgWeight1748 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2723 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Nissan Pathfinder and 2003 Ford Thunderbird approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Pathfinder leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…