DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Ford Thunderbird vs 2003 Nissan 350Z Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan 350Z

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 3.75 points.

75.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeNissan
ThunderbirdModel350Z
2003Model year2003
CabrioletBody typeCoupe
2Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

6,8 s0–100 km/h5,9 s
220 km/hTop speed250 km/h
3950 ccEngine displacement3498 cc
283 HPPower283 HP
388 NmTorque352 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank70 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption16,1 lt
10,3 ltExtra-urban consumption8,7 lt
—Average consumption11,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
235/50 R17Tyre size225/50 R18; 245/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4730 mmLength4310 mm
1829 mmWidth1816 mm
1323 mmHeight1316 mm
1748 KgWeight1545 Kg
2723 mmWheelbase2650 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Ford Thunderbird and 2003 Nissan 350Z approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan 350Z leads the E-Kıyasla score by 3.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…