1994 • Ford
Tempo
Ford Tempo 2.3 (102 Hp) 1994Overall Score62.25/100
1994 Ford Tempo vs 1994 Audi 100 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1994 • Audi
100
Audi 100 2.5 TDI (115 Hp) 1994Overall Score61.25/100
WINNER
Ford Tempo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
62.25–61.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford TempoSpecificationAudi 100
FordMakeAudi
TempoModel100
1994Model year1994
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Ford TempoSpecificationAudi 100
—0–100 km/h11,1 s
160 km/hTop speed195 km/h
2307 ccEngine displacement2461 cc
102 HPPower115 HP
176 NmTorque265 Nm
4Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Ford TempoSpecificationAudi 100
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank80 lt
11 ltUrban consumption7,5 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
—Average consumption6,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford TempoSpecificationAudi 100
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
185/70 R14Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford TempoSpecificationAudi 100
4490 mmLength4790 mm
1735 mmWidth1777 mm
1340 mmHeight1431 mm
1180 KgWeight1425 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2687 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1994 Ford Tempo and 1994 Audi 100 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Tempo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…