1994 • Audi
100
Audi 100 2.5 TDI (115 Hp) 1994Overall Score61.25/100
1994 Audi 100 vs 1994 Ford Tempo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1994 • Ford
Tempo
Ford Tempo 2.3 (102 Hp) 1994Overall Score62.25/100
WINNER
Ford Tempo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
61.25–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 100SpecificationFord Tempo
AudiMakeFord
100ModelTempo
1994Model year1994
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Audi 100SpecificationFord Tempo
11,1 s0–100 km/h—
195 km/hTop speed160 km/h
2461 ccEngine displacement2307 cc
115 HPPower102 HP
265 NmTorque176 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 100SpecificationFord Tempo
DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption11 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
6,1 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Audi 100SpecificationFord Tempo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/70 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Audi 100SpecificationFord Tempo
4790 mmLength4490 mm
1777 mmWidth1735 mm
1431 mmHeight1340 mm
1425 KgWeight1180 Kg
2687 mmWheelbase2540 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1994 Audi 100 and 1994 Ford Tempo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Tempo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…