DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Mitsubishi L 200 vs 1994 Ford Tempo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Tempo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

61.25–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeFord
L 200ModelTempo
1994Model year1994
Pick-upBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

152 km/hTop speed160 km/h
2477 ccEngine displacement2307 cc
90 HPPower102 HP
240 NmTorque176 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption11 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/80 R16Tyre size185/70 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4500 mmLength4490 mm
1655 mmWidth1735 mm
1570 mmHeight1340 mm
1820 KgWeight1180 Kg
2230 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Mitsubishi L 200 and 1994 Ford Tempo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Tempo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…