DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Ford Taurus vs 1995 Mitsubishi Debonair Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Taurus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

75.75–74.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeMitsubishi
TaurusModelDebonair
1995Model year1995
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

219 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3392 ccEngine displacement3496 cc
225 HPPower260 HP
311 NmTorque324 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank72 lt
11,3 ltAverage consumption9,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
225/55 R16Tyre size215/65 R15 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5016 mmLength4975 mm
1854 mmWidth1815 mm
1400 mmHeight1440 mm
1608 KgWeight1780 Kg
2756 mmWheelbase2745 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Ford Taurus and 1995 Mitsubishi Debonair approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Taurus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…