DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Jaguar XJ vs 1995 Ford Taurus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Taurus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

74.75–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeFord
XJModelTaurus
1995Model year1995
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

8,4 s0–100 km/h—
223 km/hTop speed219 km/h
3239 ccEngine displacement3392 cc
211 HPPower225 HP
301 NmTorque311 Nm
6Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
86 ltFuel tank61 lt
11,2 ltAverage consumption11,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
225/60 R16Tyre size225/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5023 mmLength5016 mm
1798 mmWidth1854 mm
1314 mmHeight1400 mm
1800 KgWeight1608 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2756 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Jaguar XJ and 1995 Ford Taurus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Taurus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…