DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Mitsubishi Debonair vs 1995 Ford Taurus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Taurus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

74.75–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeFord
DebonairModelTaurus
1995Model year1995
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed219 km/h
3496 ccEngine displacement3392 cc
260 HPPower225 HP
324 NmTorque311 Nm
6Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank61 lt
9,6 ltAverage consumption11,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
215/65 R15 HTyre size225/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4975 mmLength5016 mm
1815 mmWidth1854 mm
1440 mmHeight1400 mm
1780 KgWeight1608 Kg
2745 mmWheelbase2756 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Mitsubishi Debonair and 1995 Ford Taurus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Taurus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…