DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Ford Taurus vs 1995 Jaguar XJ Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Taurus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

75.75–74.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeJaguar
TaurusModelXJ
1995Model year1995
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,4 s
219 km/hTop speed223 km/h
3392 ccEngine displacement3239 cc
225 HPPower211 HP
311 NmTorque301 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank86 lt
11,3 ltAverage consumption11,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
225/55 R16Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5016 mmLength5023 mm
1854 mmWidth1798 mm
1400 mmHeight1314 mm
1608 KgWeight1800 Kg
2756 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Ford Taurus and 1995 Jaguar XJ approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Taurus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…