2000 • Mercury
Sable
Mercury Sable 3.0 i V6 24V (203 Hp) 2000Overall Score74.5/100
2000 Mercury Sable vs 1999 Ford Taurus Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Ford
Taurus
Ford Taurus 3.0 V6 24V (203 Hp) 1999Overall Score73.5/100
WINNER
Mercury Sable
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
74.5–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mercury SableSpecificationFord Taurus
MercuryMakeFord
SableModelTaurus
2000Model year1999
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Mercury SableSpecificationFord Taurus
200 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
203 HPPower203 HP
271 NmTorque271 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Mercury SableSpecificationFord Taurus
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank61 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption—
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Mercury SableSpecificationFord Taurus
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/65 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mercury SableSpecificationFord Taurus
5070 mmLength5070 mm
1850 mmWidth1854 mm
1410 mmHeight1463 mm
1545 KgWeight1602 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2756 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mercury Sable and 1999 Ford Taurus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mercury Sable leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…