DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Ford Taurus vs 2000 Toyota Sienna Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Sienna

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeToyota
TaurusModelSienna
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2995 cc
200 HPPower197 HP
271 NmTorque284 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank79 lt
—Urban consumption13,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
215/60 R16Tyre size205/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5019 mmLength4910 mm
1854 mmWidth1860 mm
1425 mmHeight1710 mm
1530 KgWeight1705 Kg
2756 mmWheelbase2900 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Ford Taurus and 2000 Toyota Sienna approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Sienna leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…