DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi Challenger vs 2000 Ford Taurus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Challenger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeFord
ChallengerModelTaurus
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

170 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2972 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
185 HPPower200 HP
265 NmTorque271 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
74 ltFuel tank68 lt
16 ltUrban consumption—
10 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
265/70 R15Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4530 mmLength5019 mm
1775 mmWidth1854 mm
1730 mmHeight1425 mm
1830 KgWeight1530 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2756 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi Challenger and 2000 Ford Taurus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Challenger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…