2006 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 4.0 V6 (207 Hp) 2006Overall Score73.75/100
2006 Ford Ranger vs 2006 Nissan Patrol Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2006 • Nissan
Patrol
Nissan Patrol 4.2 TD (160 Hp) 2006Overall Score74.5/100
WINNER
Nissan Patrol
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
73.75–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationNissan Patrol
FordMakeNissan
RangerModelPatrol
2006Model year2006
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
4Seats5
2Doors3
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationNissan Patrol
0 km/hTop speed150 km/h
4014 ccEngine displacement4169 cc
207 HPPower160 HP
323 NmTorque331 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford RangerSpecificationNissan Patrol
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
95 ltFuel tank95 lt
—Urban consumption20 lt
—Extra-urban consumption11 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationNissan Patrol
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
235/75 R15Tyre size265/70 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationNissan Patrol
4763 mmLength4440 mm
1763 mmWidth1930 mm
1648 mmHeight1850 mm
1399 KgWeight2320 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2400 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2006 Ford Ranger and 2006 Nissan Patrol approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Patrol leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…