DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Jeep Wrangler vs 2006 Ford Ranger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Wrangler

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

74.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeFord
WranglerModelRanger
2006Model year2006
SUVBody typePick-up
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3778 ccEngine displacement4014 cc
196 HPPower207 HP
315 NmTorque323 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank95 lt
16,7 ltUrban consumption—
9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
11,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
255/75 R17Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4751 mmLength4763 mm
1877 mmWidth1763 mm
1834 mmHeight1648 mm
1895 KgWeight1399 Kg
2946 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Jeep Wrangler and 2006 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Wrangler leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…