DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Buick Lucerne vs 2006 Ford Ranger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Buick Lucerne

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

74.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BuickMakeFord
LucerneModelRanger
2006Model year2006
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement4014 cc
197 HPPower207 HP
305 NmTorque323 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank95 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption—
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
225/60 R16Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5182 mmLength4763 mm
1880 mmWidth1763 mm
1473 mmHeight1648 mm
1745 KgWeight1399 Kg
2934 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Buick Lucerne and 2006 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Buick Lucerne leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…