2006 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 4.0 V6 (207 Hp) 2006Overall Score73.75/100
2006 Ford Ranger vs 2006 Jeep Wrangler Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2006 • Jeep
Wrangler
Jeep Wrangler 3.8i V6 12V (196 Hp) 2006Overall Score74.5/100
WINNER
Jeep Wrangler
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
73.75–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationJeep Wrangler
FordMakeJeep
RangerModelWrangler
2006Model year2006
Pick-upBody typeSUV
4Seats5
2Doors5
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationJeep Wrangler
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
4014 ccEngine displacement3778 cc
207 HPPower196 HP
323 NmTorque315 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford RangerSpecificationJeep Wrangler
PetrolFuel typePetrol
95 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption16,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9 lt
—Average consumption11,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationJeep Wrangler
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
235/75 R15Tyre size255/75 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationJeep Wrangler
4763 mmLength4751 mm
1763 mmWidth1877 mm
1648 mmHeight1834 mm
1399 KgWeight1895 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2946 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2006 Ford Ranger and 2006 Jeep Wrangler approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Jeep Wrangler leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…