DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Ford Ranger vs 2005 Ford Explorer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeFord
RangerModelExplorer
2004Model year2005
Pick-upBody typeEstate
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,0 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
4014 ccEngine displacement3996 cc
207 HPPower213 HP
323 NmTorque339 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
95 ltFuel tank85 lt
—Urban consumption15,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption11,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
235/75 R15Tyre size235/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4763 mmLength4810 mm
1763 mmWidth1830 mm
1648 mmHeight1830 mm
1399 KgWeight1965 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2890 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Ford Ranger and 2005 Ford Explorer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…