DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Ford Explorer vs 2004 Ford Ranger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeFord
ExplorerModelRanger
2005Model year2004
EstateBody typePick-up
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3996 ccEngine displacement4014 cc
213 HPPower207 HP
339 NmTorque323 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
85 ltFuel tank95 lt
15,7 ltUrban consumption—
11,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/70 R16Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4810 mmLength4763 mm
1830 mmWidth1763 mm
1830 mmHeight1648 mm
1965 KgWeight1399 Kg
2890 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Ford Explorer and 2004 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…