DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Ford Mustang vs 2004 Ford Ranger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mustang

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeFord
MustangModelRanger
2005Model year2004
CabrioletBody typePick-up
4Seats4
2Doors2

Performance

7,0 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4009 ccEngine displacement4014 cc
212 HPPower207 HP
325 NmTorque323 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank95 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption—
10,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/65 R16Tyre size235/75 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4765 mmLength4763 mm
1877 mmWidth1763 mm
1415 mmHeight1648 mm
1625 KgWeight1399 Kg
2720 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Ford Mustang and 2004 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…