2002 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 4.0 V6 (207 Hp) 2002Overall Score70.75/100
2002 Ford Ranger vs 1999 Mazda B-series Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Mazda
B-series
Mazda B-series 4.0 V6 (207 Hp) 1999Overall Score69.75/100
WINNER
Ford Ranger
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
70.75–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationMazda B-series
FordMakeMazda
RangerModelB-series
2002Model year1999
Pick-upBody typePick-up
4Seats4
2Doors4
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationMazda B-series
0 km/hTop speed145 km/h
4014 ccEngine displacement3992 cc
207 HPPower207 HP
323 NmTorque322 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationMazda B-series
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/75 R15Tyre size225/70 R15
YesABS—
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationMazda B-series
4763 mmLength5154 mm
1763 mmWidth1763 mm
1648 mmHeight1646 mm
1399 KgWeight—
2835 mmWheelbase3198 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Ford Ranger and 1999 Mazda B-series approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSChevrolet Astro vs Ford Ranger2002 and 2002 model years
VSFord Explorer vs Ford Ranger2002 and 2002 model yearsImage unavailableVSMazda B-series vs Ford Ranger1999 and 2002 model years
VSFord Mustang vs Ford Ranger2005 and 2002 model yearsImage unavailableVSFord F-150 vs Ford Ranger2005 and 2002 model yearsComments are loading…