DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Mazda B-series vs 2002 Ford Ranger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Ranger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

69.75–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeFord
B-seriesModelRanger
1999Model year2002
Pick-upBody typePick-up
4Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

145 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3992 ccEngine displacement4014 cc
207 HPPower207 HP
322 NmTorque323 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank95 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/70 R15Tyre size235/75 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

5154 mmLength4763 mm
1763 mmWidth1763 mm
1646 mmHeight1648 mm
—Weight1399 Kg
3198 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Mazda B-series and 2002 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…