DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Chevrolet Astro vs 2002 Ford Ranger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Astro

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeFord
AstroModelRanger
2002Model year2002
MinivanBody typePick-up
8Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

170 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4300 ccEngine displacement4014 cc
192 HPPower207 HP
339 NmTorque323 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
102 ltFuel tank95 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption—
11,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
215/75 R15Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4821 mmLength4763 mm
1969 mmWidth1763 mm
1903 mmHeight1648 mm
2025 KgWeight1399 Kg
2825 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Chevrolet Astro and 2002 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Astro leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…