1999 • Volvo
S70
Volvo S70 2.5 20 V (165 Hp) 1999Overall Score47.25/100
1999 Volvo S70 vs 2003 Ford Ranger Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 3.0 V6 (154 Hp) 2003Overall Score48.25/100
WINNER
Ford Ranger
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
47.25–48.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo S70SpecificationFord Ranger
VolvoMakeFord
S70ModelRanger
1999Model year2003
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats4
4Doors2
Performance
Volvo S70SpecificationFord Ranger
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement0 cc
165 HPPower154 HP
0 NmTorque0 Nm
—Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo S70SpecificationFord Ranger
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size225/70 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo S70SpecificationFord Ranger
—Length4763 mm
—Width1786 mm
—Height1648 mm
—Weight1397 Kg
—Wheelbase2835 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Volvo S70 and 2003 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…