2006 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.5 TDCi (143 Hp) 2006Overall Score67.75/100
2006 Ford Ranger vs 2006 Volvo S80 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2006 • Volvo
S80
Volvo S80 2.4 i 20V (170 Hp) 2006Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Volvo S80
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationVolvo S80
FordMakeVolvo
RangerModelS80
2006Model year2006
Pick-upBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationVolvo S80
—0–100 km/h9,9 s
0 km/hTop speed215 km/h
2499 ccEngine displacement2435 cc
143 HPPower170 HP
330 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Ford RangerSpecificationVolvo S80
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption11 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationVolvo S80
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/75 R15; 245/70 R16Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationVolvo S80
5075 mmLength4822 mm
1805 mmWidth1832 mm
1745 mmHeight1434 mm
—Weight1470 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase2791 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2006 Ford Ranger and 2006 Volvo S80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo S80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…