2006 • Chevrolet
Epica
Chevrolet Epica 2.5 i 24V (154) 2006Overall Score68.5/100
2006 Chevrolet Epica vs 2006 Ford Ranger Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2006 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.5 TDCi (143 Hp) 2006Overall Score67.75/100
WINNER
Chevrolet Epica
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Chevrolet EpicaSpecificationFord Ranger
ChevroletMakeFord
EpicaModelRanger
2006Model year2006
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Chevrolet EpicaSpecificationFord Ranger
9,9 s0–100 km/h—
208 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2492 ccEngine displacement2499 cc
154 HPPower143 HP
237 NmTorque330 Nm
6Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Chevrolet EpicaSpecificationFord Ranger
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank70 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption—
6,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,3 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Chevrolet EpicaSpecificationFord Ranger
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/50 R17Tyre size235/75 R15; 245/70 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Chevrolet EpicaSpecificationFord Ranger
4804 mmLength5075 mm
1807 mmWidth1805 mm
1449 mmHeight1745 mm
1630 KgWeight—
2700 mmWheelbase3000 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2006 Chevrolet Epica and 2006 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Chevrolet Epica leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…