2006 • Kia
Carnival
Kia Carnival 2.5i V6 (150 Hp) 2006Overall Score68.5/100
2006 Kia Carnival vs 2006 Ford Ranger Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2006 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.5 TDCi (143 Hp) 2006Overall Score67.75/100
WINNER
Kia Carnival
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia CarnivalSpecificationFord Ranger
KiaMakeFord
CarnivalModelRanger
2006Model year2006
MinivanBody typePick-up
7Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Kia CarnivalSpecificationFord Ranger
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2499 cc
150 HPPower143 HP
224 NmTorque330 Nm
6Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia CarnivalSpecificationFord Ranger
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank70 lt
14,1 ltUrban consumption—
9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,9 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Kia CarnivalSpecificationFord Ranger
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/65 R15Tyre size235/75 R15; 245/70 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Kia CarnivalSpecificationFord Ranger
4925 mmLength5075 mm
1900 mmWidth1805 mm
1730 mmHeight1745 mm
1988 KgWeight—
2905 mmWheelbase3000 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2006 Kia Carnival and 2006 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Carnival leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…