DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Ford Ranger vs 2006 Suzuki Verona Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Suzuki Verona

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeSuzuki
RangerModelVerona
2006Model year2006
Pick-upBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,8 s
0 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2499 ccEngine displacement2492 cc
143 HPPower156 HP
330 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption12,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,8 lt
—Average consumption8,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/75 R15; 245/70 R16Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5075 mmLength4770 mm
1805 mmWidth1815 mm
1745 mmHeight1440 mm
—Weight1535 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Ford Ranger and 2006 Suzuki Verona approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Suzuki Verona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…