2006 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.5 TDCi (143 Hp) 2006Overall Score67.75/100
2006 Ford Ranger vs 2006 Mitsubishi L 200 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2006 • Mitsubishi
L 200
Mitsubishi L 200 2.5 TD (136 Hp) 2006Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Ford Ranger
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 5.25 points.
67.75–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationMitsubishi L 200
FordMakeMitsubishi
RangerModelL 200
2006Model year2006
Pick-upBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationMitsubishi L 200
—0–100 km/h14,6 s
0 km/hTop speed167 km/h
2499 ccEngine displacement2477 cc
143 HPPower136 HP
330 NmTorque314 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford RangerSpecificationMitsubishi L 200
DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Average consumption8,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationMitsubishi L 200
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
235/75 R15; 245/70 R16Tyre size205/80 R16
YesABS—
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationMitsubishi L 200
5075 mmLength5000 mm
1805 mmWidth1750 mm
1745 mmHeight1775 mm
—Weight1935 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase3000 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2006 Ford Ranger and 2006 Mitsubishi L 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 5.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…