2006 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.5 TDCi (143 Hp) 2006Overall Score67.75/100
2006 Ford Ranger vs 2006 Kia Carnival Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2006 • Kia
Carnival
Kia Carnival 2.5i V6 (150 Hp) 2006Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Kia Carnival
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationKia Carnival
FordMakeKia
RangerModelCarnival
2006Model year2006
Pick-upBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors5
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationKia Carnival
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2499 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
143 HPPower150 HP
330 NmTorque224 Nm
4Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford RangerSpecificationKia Carnival
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption14,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9 lt
—Average consumption10,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationKia Carnival
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/75 R15; 245/70 R16Tyre size215/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationKia Carnival
5075 mmLength4925 mm
1805 mmWidth1900 mm
1745 mmHeight1730 mm
—Weight1988 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase2905 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2006 Ford Ranger and 2006 Kia Carnival approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Carnival leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…