DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Ford Ranger vs 2012 Mitsubishi L 200 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Ranger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeMitsubishi
RangerModelL 200
2012Model year2012
Pick-upBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

11,5 s0–100 km/h14,0 s
175 km/hTop speed167 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2477 cc
166 HPPower136 HP
226 NmTorque314 Nm
4Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank75 lt
14,1 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
8,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,8 lt
10,8 ltAverage consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
255/70 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5359 mmLength5185 mm
1850 mmWidth1750 mm
1815 mmHeight1775 mm
2048 KgWeight1870 Kg
3220 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Ford Ranger and 2012 Mitsubishi L 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…