DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mitsubishi L 200 vs 2012 Ford Ranger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Ranger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeFord
L 200ModelRanger
2012Model year2012
Pick-upBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

14,0 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
167 km/hTop speed175 km/h
2477 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
136 HPPower166 HP
314 NmTorque226 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank80 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption14,1 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption8,9 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption10,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
—Tyre size255/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5185 mmLength5359 mm
1750 mmWidth1850 mm
1775 mmHeight1815 mm
1870 KgWeight2048 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase3220 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mitsubishi L 200 and 2012 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…