DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 FAW Besturn B70 vs 2012 Ford Ranger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Ranger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FAWMakeFord
Besturn B70ModelRanger
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,5 s
0 km/hTop speed175 km/h
2261 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
163 HPPower166 HP
0 NmTorque226 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption14,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,9 lt
—Average consumption10,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size255/70 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4705 mmLength5359 mm
1782 mmWidth1850 mm
1465 mmHeight1815 mm
—Weight2048 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase3220 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 FAW Besturn B70 and 2012 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…