2012 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.5 (166 Hp) 2012Overall Score63.25/100
2012 Ford Ranger vs 2012 Ford Escape Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Ford
Escape
Ford Escape 2.5 L (153 Hp) 2012Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Ford Ranger
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationFord Escape
FordMakeFord
RangerModelEscape
2012Model year2012
Pick-upBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationFord Escape
11,5 s0–100 km/h—
175 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2495 cc
166 HPPower153 HP
226 NmTorque136 Nm
4Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford RangerSpecificationFord Escape
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank61 lt
14,1 ltUrban consumption—
8,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,8 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationFord Escape
5359 mmLength4480 mm
1850 mmWidth1845 mm
1815 mmHeight1730 mm
2048 KgWeight1605 Kg
3220 mmWheelbase2620 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Ford Ranger and 2012 Ford Escape approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSFord Escape vs Ford Ranger2012 and 2012 model yearsImage unavailableVSScion tC vs Ford Ranger2012 and 2012 model years
VSToyota Hilux vs Ford Ranger2012 and 2012 model yearsImage unavailableVSFAW Besturn B70 vs Ford Ranger2012 and 2012 model yearsImage unavailableVSMitsubishi L 200 vs Ford Ranger2012 and 2012 model yearsComments are loading…