2003 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.3 (143 Hp) 2003Overall Score62.5/100
2003 Ford Ranger vs 2003 Hyundai XG Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Hyundai
XG
Hyundai XG 2.4 i 16V (139 Hp) 2003Overall Score63.25/100
WINNER
Hyundai XG
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationHyundai XG
FordMakeHyundai
RangerModelXG
2003Model year2003
Pick-upBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationHyundai XG
0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2255 ccEngine displacement2351 cc
143 HPPower139 HP
209 NmTorque192 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford RangerSpecificationHyundai XG
PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption13 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationHyundai XG
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/70 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationHyundai XG
4763 mmLength4865 mm
1786 mmWidth1825 mm
1648 mmHeight1420 mm
1397 KgWeight1865 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2750 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Ford Ranger and 2003 Hyundai XG approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Hyundai XG leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…