DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Hyundai XG vs 2003 Ford Ranger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Hyundai XG

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HyundaiMakeFord
XGModelRanger
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

170 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2351 ccEngine displacement2255 cc
139 HPPower143 HP
192 NmTorque209 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank62 lt
13 ltUrban consumption—
7 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size225/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4865 mmLength4763 mm
1825 mmWidth1786 mm
1420 mmHeight1648 mm
1865 KgWeight1397 Kg
2750 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Hyundai XG and 2003 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Hyundai XG leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…