DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Peugeot 607 vs 2003 Ford Ranger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Ranger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.75–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeugeotMakeFord
607ModelRanger
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

10,6 s0–100 km/h—
205 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2179 ccEngine displacement2255 cc
133 HPPower143 HP
314 NmTorque209 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank62 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption—
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/60 R16Tyre size225/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4877 mmLength4763 mm
1800 mmWidth1786 mm
1437 mmHeight1648 mm
1610 KgWeight1397 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Peugeot 607 and 2003 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…