DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Ford Ranger vs 2002 Peugeot 406 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Ranger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–61.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakePeugeot
RangerModel406
2002Model year2002
Pick-upBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,0 s
0 km/hTop speed205 km/h
2255 ccEngine displacement2179 cc
143 HPPower133 HP
209 NmTorque314 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption8,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,9 lt
—Average consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/70 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4763 mmLength4600 mm
1786 mmWidth1765 mm
1648 mmHeight1400 mm
1397 KgWeight1410 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Ford Ranger and 2002 Peugeot 406 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…