2002 • Peugeot
406
Peugeot 406 2.2 HDi (133 Hp) 2002Overall Score61.75/100
2002 Peugeot 406 vs 2002 Ford Ranger Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.3 (143 Hp) 2002Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Ford Ranger
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
61.75–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Peugeot 406SpecificationFord Ranger
PeugeotMakeFord
406ModelRanger
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats4
4Doors2
Performance
Peugeot 406SpecificationFord Ranger
11,0 s0–100 km/h—
205 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2179 ccEngine displacement2255 cc
133 HPPower143 HP
314 NmTorque209 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Peugeot 406SpecificationFord Ranger
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank62 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption—
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,4 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Peugeot 406SpecificationFord Ranger
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size225/70 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Peugeot 406SpecificationFord Ranger
4600 mmLength4763 mm
1765 mmWidth1786 mm
1400 mmHeight1648 mm
1410 KgWeight1397 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2835 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Peugeot 406 and 2002 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…