2002 • Ford
Focus
Ford Focus 2.3 i 16V ST (153 Hp) 2002Overall Score63.25/100
2002 Ford Focus vs 2002 Ford Ranger Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.3 (143 Hp) 2002Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Ford Focus
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford FocusSpecificationFord Ranger
FordMakeFord
FocusModelRanger
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats4
4Doors2
Performance
Ford FocusSpecificationFord Ranger
7,9 s0–100 km/h—
193 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2261 ccEngine displacement2255 cc
153 HPPower143 HP
209 NmTorque209 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford FocusSpecificationFord Ranger
PetrolFuel typePetrol
53 ltFuel tank62 lt
10,7 ltUrban consumption—
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Ford FocusSpecificationFord Ranger
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size225/70 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford FocusSpecificationFord Ranger
4450 mmLength4763 mm
1699 mmWidth1786 mm
1430 mmHeight1648 mm
1280 KgWeight1397 Kg
2615 mmWheelbase2835 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Ford Focus and 2002 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Focus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…