2002 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.3 (143 Hp) 2002Overall Score62.5/100
2002 Ford Ranger vs 2002 Ford Focus Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Ford
Focus
Ford Focus 2.3 i 16V ST (153 Hp) 2002Overall Score63.25/100
WINNER
Ford Focus
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationFord Focus
FordMakeFord
RangerModelFocus
2002Model year2002
Pick-upBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationFord Focus
—0–100 km/h7,9 s
0 km/hTop speed193 km/h
2255 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
143 HPPower153 HP
209 NmTorque209 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford RangerSpecificationFord Focus
PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank53 lt
—Urban consumption10,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationFord Focus
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/70 R15Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationFord Focus
4763 mmLength4450 mm
1786 mmWidth1699 mm
1648 mmHeight1430 mm
1397 KgWeight1280 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2615 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Ford Ranger and 2002 Ford Focus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Focus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…