DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Ford Puma vs 2002 BMW Z3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Puma

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford PumaSpecificationBMW Z3
FordMakeBMW
PumaModelZ3
2002Model year2002
CoupeBody typeCabriolet
2+2Seats2
3Doors2

Performance

Ford PumaSpecificationBMW Z3
9,2 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
203 km/hTop speed196 km/h
1679 ccEngine displacement1895 cc
125 HPPower118 HP
157 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Ford PumaSpecificationBMW Z3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank51 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption11 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Ford PumaSpecificationBMW Z3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/50 R15Tyre size225/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford PumaSpecificationBMW Z3
3984 mmLength4050 mm
1674 mmWidth1740 mm
1345 mmHeight1288 mm
1040 KgWeight1220 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2446 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Ford Puma and 2002 BMW Z3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Puma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…