DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Suzuki Grand Vitara vs 2002 Ford Puma Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Suzuki Grand Vitara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeFord
Grand VitaraModelPuma
2002Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeCoupe
4Seats2+2
3Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,2 s
150 km/hTop speed203 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1679 cc
107 HPPower125 HP
144 NmTorque157 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
56 ltFuel tank42 lt
12 ltUrban consumption9,7 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
—Average consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/65 R16Tyre size195/50 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3810 mmLength3984 mm
1700 mmWidth1674 mm
1690 mmHeight1345 mm
1200 KgWeight1040 Kg
2200 mmWheelbase2446 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Suzuki Grand Vitara and 2002 Ford Puma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Suzuki Grand Vitara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…