DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 BMW Z3 vs 2002 Ford Puma Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Puma

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW Z3SpecificationFord Puma
BMWMakeFord
Z3ModelPuma
2002Model year2002
CabrioletBody typeCoupe
2Seats2+2
2Doors3

Performance

BMW Z3SpecificationFord Puma
10,4 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
196 km/hTop speed203 km/h
1895 ccEngine displacement1679 cc
118 HPPower125 HP
190 NmTorque157 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

BMW Z3SpecificationFord Puma
PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank42 lt
11 ltUrban consumption9,7 lt
6 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
—Average consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW Z3SpecificationFord Puma
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/50 R16Tyre size195/50 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW Z3SpecificationFord Puma
4050 mmLength3984 mm
1740 mmWidth1674 mm
1288 mmHeight1345 mm
1220 KgWeight1040 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2446 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 BMW Z3 and 2002 Ford Puma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Puma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…