2002 • Ford
Puma
Ford Puma 1.7 16V (125 Hp) 2002Overall Score59.5/100
2002 Ford Puma vs 2002 Suzuki Grand Vitara Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Suzuki
Grand Vitara
Suzuki Grand Vitara 1.6 i 16V (3 dr) 2002Overall Score60.25/100
WINNER
Suzuki Grand Vitara
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford PumaSpecificationSuzuki Grand Vitara
FordMakeSuzuki
PumaModelGrand Vitara
2002Model year2002
CoupeBody typeOff-road vehicle
2+2Seats4
3Doors3
Performance
Ford PumaSpecificationSuzuki Grand Vitara
9,2 s0–100 km/h—
203 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1679 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
125 HPPower107 HP
157 NmTorque144 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford PumaSpecificationSuzuki Grand Vitara
PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank56 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption12 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Ford PumaSpecificationSuzuki Grand Vitara
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/50 R15Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford PumaSpecificationSuzuki Grand Vitara
3984 mmLength3810 mm
1674 mmWidth1700 mm
1345 mmHeight1690 mm
1040 KgWeight1200 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2200 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Ford Puma and 2002 Suzuki Grand Vitara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Suzuki Grand Vitara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…