2001 • Ford
Puma
Ford Puma 1.7 16V (125 Hp) 2001Overall Score59.5/100
2001 Ford Puma vs 2001 Honda Integra Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2001 • Honda
Integra
Honda Integra 1.6 ZXi (120 Hp) 2001Overall Score60.25/100
WINNER
Honda Integra
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford PumaSpecificationHonda Integra
FordMakeHonda
PumaModelIntegra
2001Model year2001
CoupeBody typeCoupe
2+2Seats4
3Doors2
Performance
Ford PumaSpecificationHonda Integra
9,2 s0–100 km/h—
203 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1679 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
125 HPPower120 HP
157 NmTorque142 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford PumaSpecificationHonda Integra
PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption—
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,5 ltAverage consumption5,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford PumaSpecificationHonda Integra
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/50 R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford PumaSpecificationHonda Integra
3984 mmLength4380 mm
1674 mmWidth1695 mm
1345 mmHeight1335 mm
1040 KgWeight1050 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2570 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2001 Ford Puma and 2001 Honda Integra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Honda Integra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…