DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Audi A4 vs 2001 Ford Puma Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Puma

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi A4SpecificationFord Puma
AudiMakeFord
A4ModelPuma
2001Model year2001
EstateBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
5Doors3

Performance

Audi A4SpecificationFord Puma
11,3 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
197 km/hTop speed203 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1679 cc
125 HPPower125 HP
168 NmTorque157 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi A4SpecificationFord Puma
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank42 lt
13 ltUrban consumption9,7 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
9,3 ltAverage consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi A4SpecificationFord Puma
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/50 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi A4SpecificationFord Puma
4479 mmLength3984 mm
1733 mmWidth1674 mm
1417 mmHeight1345 mm
1390 KgWeight1040 Kg
2607 mmWheelbase2446 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Audi A4 and 2001 Ford Puma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Puma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…